Desperately seeking a new organisational model (with own car & gsoh)

A lot of the conversations i'm having at the moment are about change (obvs). The largest problem i'm having is that this is not a change to, but a change from. Or more clearly: WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE DESTINATION LOOKS LIKE.

Lets be clear: there is no-one doing it that we can copy. There is no toolkit. There is not even very good examples that work after the initial enthusiasm has run out.But there are people all over the UK working on it. so we have hope too.

However, there are parallels to draw, associations to make. Voluntary organisations are being bought into public commissioning for their innovation, yet the public bodies are asking them to design projects which are not like anything they have done before. They want services that rely much more heavily on technology and on volunteer effort, and that (whisper it) are simpler cheaper.

So here's a parallel. The evolution of political organisation.

(I have a similar chart at home for how organisations operate, but the final box is still a blank.. )

So where do we start? I was talking to the CEO of a CVS about the amount of time they spend doing tasks which added no value to their work. then you multiply this. but merging is a blunt tool. I think we need to separate the task of running an org from leading an org. and i know some people employ an operations manager and separate this from the CEO. but this still keeps the problems in house.

I'm thinking of some way for small organisations to outsource their business functions (HR, payroll, even staff management in some respects) so that all participants are free to pursue the mission. So something like the fiscal sponsorship that @GMAddVentures are trialling. So something like a solicitors model may emerge for social change organisations along this spectrum:

Contracted out

Delivered by partners

Staff-led

Volunteer-led

Customer self-led

Now where did i put that GSOH..

(I also like):

• a national grid for community infrastructure - julian dobson
• participatory paradigms - tessy briton
• mititant optimists - david barrie

Strategic Planning for Networks.. (what can we learn from the planning behind wikipedia's 100,000 volunteer editors)

I'm interested in how we can leverage huge numbers of people from around the world towards a collective pro-social aim. The best example of this (and yet to be replicated) is wikipedia.

Below are some slides from their planning explaining how they moved from a mission of "all information for everyone" to 100,000 volunteer editors around the world, maintaining the 4th most read website on earth. This is a bottom-up, consensus-driven, multi-stakeholder model. Diverse volunteers can create fast, fluid and innovative projects that outperform the largest and best financed enterprises..

Lets be completely honest. Our current method of: context, gap analysis and strategic planning WILL NOT GET US HERE. This isn't about a communication strategy, or dissemination or viral applications. Its about how we sell a massive challenge and manage millions of separate contributions into a whole. And we cannot do that by using the same strategy tools.As the slides say: "the plan is not the point, the point is activation".

So how do we make it happen? Here's their 5 steps:

1. focus on asking Qs
2. make a space for it to happen
3. focus on people
4. model transparency
5. fail fast

Strategic Planning for Networks from Eugene Kim

the relational state

I was reading Nestas's report on complaints driving innovation and i thought their diagram on The Relational State was a pretty good summary.