Thursday 18 October 2012

Some thoughts on localism, the role of the state, and the very visible fist of the free market ..

Here's some quotes from the TUC's localism guide in bold - and some of my thoughts. I don't think things are as clear cut as left vs right/ state vs free market. but there is a lot of unhappiness that is probably avoidable with a different system, so ignoring it is not really an issue either..

"The tension between local control and the free market represents perhaps the greatest threat to the survival of local voluntary action in this new, post-welfare state world.


Is that the electorate doesn't generally want things to stay as they are. Also the labour model of putting money (and therefore choice) into people hands had mixed results. The ‘end of social problems’ turned into ‘the maintenance of social problems’..

But do we have any evidence that shows competition = efficiency..?

It certainly = cheaper. But if the only efficiency is taking money out of working people’s wages (which has negative connotations on the economy, on deprived areas, and on people’s self esteem). Working towards unskilled McJobs can’t be out countries long term strategy. and we have bad case studies on either side (privatising the railways was a disaster, many others regarded as the normal working of a 21 century state)

"Freeing people from the state’s ‘chains.’ is fine, but freedom without capacity to exercise it is hollow."

Yup. On the other hand I’m not convinced by the those who have been unsatisfied with the status quo for the last 15 years and have the attitude “we need to keep on fighting the government, and get paid to do it” . What’s the end goal for that, or is it just platitudes for the chattering classes? and who should have to pay to ensure justice in a free society. not having any support between the individual is not fair, but neither is the middle class tier that is supported by crime (through the criminal justice system) or social service (social workers, or community college educators). 

Who should support the system that helps people exercise their individual freedoms..?

One pathway ahead lies through stronger routine dialogue with public sector paid staff, trade unions and church or faith groups, who are developing challenges to policies which are destroying hard-won services. A plea for independence, free thinking and action lies close to this heart of darkness. Voluntary action is a complement to our welfare state, not a substitute for it.

Yup. So we need to work within the systems which are here, not pray for better ones. This is akin to the behavioural economics argument: lets base public decisions on what people actually do, not what they say that do. More to follow..

https://www.tuc.org.uk/tucfiles/354/Localism_Guide_2012.pdf

Infrastructure funding from BIG - (what won't they do in the future)..


Sunday 14 October 2012

The search for meaning..


York Volunteering City-Wide feedback mechanism by 2015 proposal..

York Volunteering City 2015 proposal:

We are trying to:
1. Increase the quality of the current York volunteering offer
2. Raise the voice of the volunteer in designing York volunteering offers

In order to: make York the volunteering city of the UK by 2015

 Initial thoughts of yearly focuses:
  1. Year 1: start small. Launch the volunteer charter, and signup 10 VCOs with the city-wide feedbackmechanism.
  2. Year 2: Grow VCO paid offer. Present 2013 survey results at conference focussing on quality. Implement charter champions throughout York. External investment required.
  3. Year 3: Commission research on what York’s non-volunteers might want. Build volunteer input: leading on the yearly survey, and support for the charter champions.
  4. Year 4: have a push on people-led volunteering projects in partnership with the universities. Link up volunteering and giving mechanisms, possibly http://geniusyork.com
  5. Year 5: work on a yearly menu of volunteering opportunities with a programme of city-wide involvement opportunities (following the Illuminate York model).

What model are we testing..?


  1. Co-create a city with volunteer actions driving influence and participatory budgeting..
  2. OR  A new volunteer-led operating model for a city: co-ordinated, customer focussed and volunteer led.
What other cities are doing something similar..?











reforms must be driven by the wishes of the users not the producers

the idea of a city-wide feedback mechanism balances some of the information asymmetry.

Giving to Strangers: motivations for volunteering..

I like the idea of Giving to Strangers. I don't like the idea of volunteering. Giving speaks of social bonds, of an unwritten social contract, or mutuality and parity. Volunteering is what old people do when they are bored and lonely.

Here's some data on motivations for volunteering:





Or the Do-it Satisfaction Survey (2009)




There's some very good accademic info on rationalism and motivations here: http://jocote.org/2010/05/professional-values 

Wednesday 10 October 2012

Remixing Social Change - A Synopsis of The Pirates Dilemma..

Warning long post. (quotes from The Pirate's Dilemma - How Youth Culture Is Reinventing Capitalism, by Matt Mason)

"For the last sixty years, capitalism has run a pretty tight ship in the West. Pirates are rocking the boat. As a result people, corporations, and governments across the planet are facing a new dilemma: How should we react to the changing conditions on our ship? Are pirates here to scupper us, or save us?

"The big bang happens when a strange new idea suddenly makes sense to a handful of people, who then transmit it to others. Experiencing one is like a revelation, a glimpse into the future."

"Rappers such as 50 Cent can make $50 million a year without even releasing a record; a graffiti artist such as Marc Ecko can develop his tag into a multinational brand worth more than $1 billion."

"The remix is changing the way production and consumption are structured. open-source ways of working are generating a wealth of new public goods, niche markets, knowledge, and resources—free tools for the rest of us to build both commercial and noncommercial ventures"

"Punk, empowered ordinary people. Not only did they encourage others to start making music, but also to design their own clothes, start fanzines, and set up gigs, demonstrations, record stores, and record labels."

Capitalism responded by selling us punk.
  • In 1989, 58 percent of the U.K. population claimed they were happy, but this figure had fallen to 45 percent by 2003, despite a 60 percent increase in average incomes. Punk combined altruism with self-interest - punk made the idea of putting purpose before profit seem cool to an entire generation.
  • Sealand went from being the world’s first man-made sovereign state, but also the first global capital of Internet anarchy.
  • The American Founding Fathers pursued a policy of counterfeiting European inventions, ignoring global patents, and stealing intellectual property wholesale. Europeans began referring to them with the Dutch word “Janke,” then slang for pirate, which is today pronounced “Yankee.
  • "You need a computer for social change. we now associate good deeds with good shopping."
  • "we manipulate an existing media format to create what he wanted, regardless of the conventional wisdom"
Mason's seven abundantly clear things about abundance:
  1. If you want to beat pirates, copy them.
  2. "Good business is the best art." - Andy Warhol
  3. The art of storytelling is changing because of abundance.
  4. Don't let legal ruin a good remix without talking to marketing first
  5. Abundance is better than advertising.
  6. Some good experiences will always be scarce.
  7. In an economy based on abundance, your business model needs to be a virtuous circle.




Piracy is how inefficient systems are replaced


Cut-’n’-Paste Culture
Humans have always created new things by repurposing old ones.
  1. Tom Moulton - remixed dance tracks for Gloria Gaynor, but did them initially without her permission.
  2. The Phantom Menace - Fan Edit began to circulate online in early 2001, a new unofficial version that severed more than twenty minutes of the original, leaving the elements that had bugged many fans—namely the character Jar Jar Binks and young Anakin’s childish dialogue—on the cutting-room floor.
  3. James Brown is the most sampled man in the history of music, undoubtedly boosted by the hip-hop generation’s obsession with sampling him.
  4. The BBC has introduced the Creative Archive, a copyright-free library of video and audio available for anyone to use for noncommercial purposes.

The Battle for Public Space:
  1. "Coca-Cola, Newport, Pepsi, Tagging -  it’s the same thing. You see my logo a million times, I will be famous.”
  2. guerrilla marketing or culture jamming
  3. Talk Back - to advertising
  4. "Less Fences = Better Neighbours"
  5. This isn’t about undermining their ability to earn money. What’s actually being undermined is the very idea of why we work. Our work ethic is more of a play ethic.
  6. LL Cool J name checking a rival brand in a Gap commercial
  7. Weaker Boundaries = Stronger Foundations
"It’s easier than ever to get ideas out there, but “there” is a lot more crowded.."

Memes:
"A meme is when a thought goes out and becomes part of consciousness.

“It took 40 years for radio to have 10 million users...15 years for TV to have 10 million users. It only took 3 years for Netscape to get to 10 million, and it took Hotmail and Napster less than a year....The time it takes for an idea to circulate is approaching zero.”

How to Look After a Virus:
  1. Let the audience make the rules.
  2. Avoid the limelight; talk only to your audience.
  3. Feed the virus according to its size.
  4. Let it die.
Parkour turned into a corporate circus almost instantly because Madonna, James Bond, and the BBC are already into it. Increasingly, when new forms of youth culture survive, it’s because they are things the media wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole - we are pushing people into the margins in order to express themselves. Did Happy Slapping have anything to do with Ultimate Fighting, or Jackass?

Youth cultures and fads have become marketing tools, but deeper underground, something else is happening. Seth Godin points out in Unleashing the Ideavirus, “It took 40 years for radio to have 10 million users...15 years for TV to have 10 million users. It only took 3 years for Netscape to get to 10 million, and it took Hotmail and Napster less than a year....The time it takes for an idea to circulate is approaching zero.”


Remixing social change
Activists, artists, entrepreneurs, and economists are championing an alternative worldview based on sustainable, democratic, decentralized networks. Multinational corporations now have to move as quickly as underground music scenes.

Three guys in their twenties started YouTube, sell it to Google for $1.65 billion twenty-one months later, and revolutionize the way television works.

Looking at the differences previous generations made with simple things such as hairstyles, turntables, and spray cans, it’s difficult to comprehend just how much new generations and youth movements are capable of, despite the relentless pursuit from corporate cool hunters. A change is gonna come.

  1. Punk made it very clear that we could do everything ourselves, and purpose should be at least as important as profit. 
  2. Pirates, like offshore radio DJs, create periods of chaos and anarchy, but improve things for the rest of us by doing so. 
  3. The millions of us who remix video games, music, films, and fashion designs are expanding and improving on those industries, forcing those who make the laws to reexamine how we treat intellectual property. 
  4. The new breed of street artists seeking to enhance our surroundings as opposed to vandalizing them act in the public interest, if only unintentionally, by counteracting the advertising cluttering public spaces. 
  5. Thanks to the influence of 1960s and ’70s counterculture, and the rave revolutionaries of the ’80s and ’90s, the dream of creating an all-powerful social machine has been realized in the personal computer. 
  6. Open-source technology has proved to be just as effective as—and in many cases more effective than—free-market competition or government regulation when it comes to generating money, efficiency, creativity, and social progress. 
  7. Hip-hop was born out of a desire to improve society for a marginalized few, but because of its ability to communicate so effectively, now has the potential to improve it for the marginalized many. 
  8. And just as mass culture thought it had figured out how to control and use youth cultures, they evolved again. Mass culture needs to learn from the ways youth cultures behave and think, not just use them for their good looks.

The Prisoner’s Dilemma:

self-interest will always result in each prisoner being worse off than if they had cooperated with each other. The most basic assumption—that we all act only in our own self-interest—is simply not true.

Imagine Players A and B are drug companies, and the pirates are those producing generic pills in a developing country. By fighting the pill pirates in this case, neither player stands to make a great deal of money, because the new market doesn’t have much. But not allowing people access to life-saving drugs means people will die needlessly, piracy will be inevitable, and the company’s image will be tarnished. But if Player B starts producing drugs in this market and competing with the pill pirates, they will gain market share (which could become profitable in time), save lives, and improve their reputation as a brand.


Conclusions
"Pirates are taking over the good ship capitalism, but they’re not here to sink it. Instead they will plug the holes, keep it afloat, and propel it forward.

"Looking at the history of youth movements, the social experiments that took hold by figuring out new ways to share, remix, and produce culture, in the long term, the benefits of this new, more democratic system seem clear. It is down to every one of us to approach the Pirate’s Dilemma from our own unique perspective and to apply the best option to our particular situation.
Over the past few decades in the West, we have entered a period of hyperindividualism, which has its pros and cons. But the power of billions of connected individuals, now flexing more power than markets, governments, and corporations using new ideas our economic model cannot yet comprehend, should be welcomed.

"Piracy isn’t just another business model, it’s one of the greatest business models we have.
Acting like a pirate—taking value from the market, or creating new spaces outside of the market and giving it back to the community, whether it’s with free open-source software or selling cheap Starbury sneakers—is a great way to serve public interests and a great way to make an authentic connection to a new audience.
Where are we going..?


http://thepiratesdilemma.com/category/uncategorized

Friday 5 October 2012

My talk at YorkCVS on "why we no longer need organisations"

BriefIn the 21 century the power of networks may replace the power of organisations in driving social change. The power of the internet has now meant that the structures needed to support an organisation as a physical entity can now be done in alternative cheaper ways, and the rise of hybrid legal structures means the old method of "group then act" can be freed up to "act then group". (See Clay Shirky on organising without organisations)

This means can avoid many of the failures of social programmes, political wrangling and react much quicker to drive genuine change. This 40 minute talk at York CVS will showcase organisations and movements which are challenging existing institutions, organisations and hierarchies..


Event 29th Oct. You can book on for FREE here: http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/event/4442555804

Monday 1 October 2012

How we interpret the world.. (or why i'm impatient for the future)

I'm always intergued by things that help us interprite the world. In the last 5 years i've been obsessed by a series of different topics, absorbing everything and then moving on (history of the 21C, contemporary art, violent arthouse cinema, luck, coaching, homicide, facts......)

So i think there wilkl be some fundamental changes in tools that help us interprite the world. I can;t wait until nationatrust places have wifi so i can check wikipedia in there, or do a virtual tour of my own choosing. or just use the place as a jumping off point for my own thoughts....


I can't wait until layar bring out a useable augmented reality app.




and i can't wait until normal interpretation in museums, art galleres, shops, airports, newspapers, everywhere looks a bit more like this:



I think information and representation is going to get so much easier. I think layers of information will be SO MUCH FUN. we will be able to see anything in anything, the object will become largely meaningless without interpretation, and for the first time (like the written bible made the democratisation of Gods word) we will be able to chose our story.

I am impatient for the future.